September 11th

This footage from CNN aired once on live television but was never played again for obvious reasons. Watch as one of their own reporters tells what he saw on the scene. He clearly states that he sees no evidence that an airliner came anywhere near the pentagon.

The second plane that struck the World Trade Center Building was photographed from multiple angles, and from every angle there is object visible on the bottom aircraft that does not exist on a normal 767.

That's not a minor detail, that means that the aircraft in question was entirely different model. In fact the plane that struck the WTC tower was not a commercial airliner at all.

It just so happens that this type of object is common on the bottom of military aircraft. The Airforce E-8C for example.

I have been through the entire set of arguments about the 911 cover up so many times with people that it has become easy to predict the common positions that people will take in defense of their world view. I say in defense of their world view, because that's exactly what it is. Accepting the truth about the events of 911 would be absolutely devastating to their reality.

One of my favorite arguments is the one that comes up when I talk to people about the velocity of objects falling through space in a vacuum and the speed that the WTC towers fell.

An object falling through space with absolutely 0 resistance, not even the resistance of air would have taken 9.22 seconds to hit the ground, yet by official record one of the buildings fell in approximately 8 seconds.

This isn't possible without some force pushing the building down from above; more specifically explosives.