911

This footage from CNN aired once on live television but was never played again for obvious reasons. Watch as one of their own reporters tells what he saw on the scene. He clearly states that he sees no evidence that an airliner came anywhere near the pentagon.

This is an interview with the construction manager of the World Trade Center buildings. What he says only verifies what the physics of the wtc attacks clearly state: An airliner alone could not have taken down the World Trade Center towers.

The firefighter's accounts of massive explosions on the lower floors of the World Trade Center building are further corroborated by this account given by a man that was in the basement at the time of the attack who states that he pulled an injured man from the basement elevator right after it exploded.

Just look at Bush's face when he tries to answer the reporters question as to whether he had advance knowledge of the September 11th attacks. If he had been on trial at that moment the jury would have put him away for life.

Maj. General Albert Stubblebine (a retired two star general of the U.S. Army) was in charge of imagery interpretation for U.S. inteligence during the cold war. Watch this video below to see what he says about what happened at the pentagon.

The second plane that struck the World Trade Center Building was photographed from multiple angles, and from every angle there is object visible on the bottom aircraft that does not exist on a normal 767.

That's not a minor detail, that means that the aircraft in question was entirely different model. In fact the plane that struck the WTC tower was not a commercial airliner at all.

It just so happens that this type of object is common on the bottom of military aircraft. The Airforce E-8C for example.

Man, These guys weren't very bright at all. What's amazing isn't that they were able to pull off a scam of these proportions, it's that so many otherwise intelligent people swallowed this crap hook line and sinker.

Larry Silverstein's accidental confession made in a CBS interview "America rebuilds" in which he admits that they decided to "pull" building seven ammounts to a serious admission of guilt.

If you want to know what happened on September 11th at the World Trade Center you have to go to the source. You have to talk to people who were there. The following video shows exerts from several interviews with the fire fighters who had were inside the WTC buildings right after the planes hit. Four firemen say that the lobbies on the lower floors of the two towers were completely destroyed, and all describe the damage as being consistent with a bomb blast. Don't take my word for it. Watch the video below and let the of the firefighters themselves tell you what they saw.

The official story is that a 757 airliner piloted by an arab terrorist slammed into the front of the building. We all saw the hole, so what's the problem?

Well to start with, the hole after the roof colapsed was only about 65 feet wide (there are pictures and video before the roof fell and the hole was considerably smaller than that) The wing span of a 757 is 124 feet 10 inches. Just look at the picture. Notice that the windows to the right and left of the hole are not broken? What about the holes that the engines would have left? These are not minor details. A plane with a 124 foot wing span does not slam into a building and leave a 65 foot hole. It's physically impossible.